<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Content, Content, Content	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 05:29:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mary Glen		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Glen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I love the way you have simplified things in this post and agree that many internet marketers over-complicate things, always looking for the shiny new thing or that new &quot;secret&quot; formula.   In fact there is a formula - as you have shown above - but it is not secret.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the way you have simplified things in this post and agree that many internet marketers over-complicate things, always looking for the shiny new thing or that new &#8220;secret&#8221; formula.   In fact there is a formula &#8211; as you have shown above &#8211; but it is not secret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: blog names		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[blog names]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great monster of a post.  I have yet to venture into PLR articles, but am seeing more and more internet marketers promoting its effective use.  I will eventually start using it to facilitate the writing process.  Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great monster of a post.  I have yet to venture into PLR articles, but am seeing more and more internet marketers promoting its effective use.  I will eventually start using it to facilitate the writing process.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Russell		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article Jennifer, as always you provide lots of great info.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Jennifer, as always you provide lots of great info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Deb Tollefson		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deb Tollefson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[He Jennifer,

I joined Killer Content - haven&#039;t been able to figure our how to get my chosen articles to link up to my wordpress free blog- the videos are confusing.  The program is awesome and when I figure it out - WOW !!

Anyway, I need help with what to type in what place and where to go to get my kc articles to publish.

Would like to upgrade but I need to make a few bucks first.  Thanks - Deb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He Jennifer,</p>
<p>I joined Killer Content &#8211; haven&#8217;t been able to figure our how to get my chosen articles to link up to my wordpress free blog- the videos are confusing.  The program is awesome and when I figure it out &#8211; WOW !!</p>
<p>Anyway, I need help with what to type in what place and where to go to get my kc articles to publish.</p>
<p>Would like to upgrade but I need to make a few bucks first.  Thanks &#8211; Deb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: klima		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klima]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I heard there were some crazy upsells to this product. Do you have any thoughts on this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard there were some crazy upsells to this product. Do you have any thoughts on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am rather new at this and a few months ago I never even thought about what &quot;content&quot; was.  I just Google for something when I needed an answer or was looking to buy something.  Content really is important.  Good content is even better!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am rather new at this and a few months ago I never even thought about what &#8220;content&#8221; was.  I just Google for something when I needed an answer or was looking to buy something.  Content really is important.  Good content is even better!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charley		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11166</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What about new internet marketers like me? Is it wise to pay for PLR if I can afford it or should I wait until I&#039;m a bit successful with the website?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about new internet marketers like me? Is it wise to pay for PLR if I can afford it or should I wait until I&#8217;m a bit successful with the website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Susanne		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susanne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[First of, I bought your OWM a couple of years back, through WA. I still have your training course and did try to implement it at Suidoo. My problem was back then (about 3 years ago) that I wanted more control of my content/web-present so I started my own website(s).
After a while I gave up, actually after having spend more than $2K which is to me a lot of money, lol
Now I am back online and more determined than ever to make this work.
I am not a good writer, but also not afraid of putting what I write on my website, as I am sure I will get better as time goes by (hopefully).
My problem is as it was before, I am trying to do too many things at once and easily get sidetracked.
Even though I keep telling myself to only follow one &#039;guru&#039; at the time, I always end up following/signing up for a bunch of newsletters or programs. Many of which I don&#039;t have the time to read, but who I would like to be associated with, lol If that makes sense...
My point is that I can&#039;t afford to hire any one, and also can&#039;t entice any of my friends or family to write content on a subject they get to choose. But writing is for me the easier part, getting the word out is harder for me...
Any way I have always admired you and knew from the get go that you did something right! Now I just need to get on with it and get going again.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of, I bought your OWM a couple of years back, through WA. I still have your training course and did try to implement it at Suidoo. My problem was back then (about 3 years ago) that I wanted more control of my content/web-present so I started my own website(s).<br />
After a while I gave up, actually after having spend more than $2K which is to me a lot of money, lol<br />
Now I am back online and more determined than ever to make this work.<br />
I am not a good writer, but also not afraid of putting what I write on my website, as I am sure I will get better as time goes by (hopefully).<br />
My problem is as it was before, I am trying to do too many things at once and easily get sidetracked.<br />
Even though I keep telling myself to only follow one &#8216;guru&#8217; at the time, I always end up following/signing up for a bunch of newsletters or programs. Many of which I don&#8217;t have the time to read, but who I would like to be associated with, lol If that makes sense&#8230;<br />
My point is that I can&#8217;t afford to hire any one, and also can&#8217;t entice any of my friends or family to write content on a subject they get to choose. But writing is for me the easier part, getting the word out is harder for me&#8230;<br />
Any way I have always admired you and knew from the get go that you did something right! Now I just need to get on with it and get going again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Plumbers Columbia		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plumbers Columbia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Really good article! Thanks.

I&#039;ve been following this blog of yours for almost a couple of years. I was wondering how many visitors you are averaging on a daily basis. I noticed that globe of yours that you have on the right sidebar is now full of &quot;red dots&quot;. A year or so ago I would see a few &quot;red dots&quot;, but nothing like it is today! Congratulations to your success.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really good article! Thanks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been following this blog of yours for almost a couple of years. I was wondering how many visitors you are averaging on a daily basis. I noticed that globe of yours that you have on the right sidebar is now full of &#8220;red dots&#8221;. A year or so ago I would see a few &#8220;red dots&#8221;, but nothing like it is today! Congratulations to your success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EMT Training by Dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EMT Training by Dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So many IM trainers are harping on quality content these days, it makes me think I need to become a novelist to get anywhere. The good thing is, content quality is relevant to the market competition, so in many markets, it&#039;s not hard to stand out with your content. Amazing post..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many IM trainers are harping on quality content these days, it makes me think I need to become a novelist to get anywhere. The good thing is, content quality is relevant to the market competition, so in many markets, it&#8217;s not hard to stand out with your content. Amazing post..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Plastic surgery abroad		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11155</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Plastic surgery abroad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11155</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Despite the importance of backlinks and SEO optimization, the most important thing in that branche is interesting and useful content of the site. That can&#039;t be replaced by any SEO techniques and tips. Anywhere, the article is amazing, you have great talent to write, please continue with your posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the importance of backlinks and SEO optimization, the most important thing in that branche is interesting and useful content of the site. That can&#8217;t be replaced by any SEO techniques and tips. Anywhere, the article is amazing, you have great talent to write, please continue with your posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: What is SEO?		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What is SEO?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jennifer,

This is a great article and it shows your great skill at writing articles which many of us don&#039;t possess.

I remember somewhere you mentioned you don&#039;t like hype.  That Killer Content guy is nothing but hype.  I really don&#039;t care where he goes on vacation and what kind of luxury car he has.  He almost put me to sleep.  I had to hit the back button on that one.

The Ultra Spinnable Articles sounds promising.  Aren&#039;t those the ones you used to build the 8 sites with?

I&#039;ve had some success getting Wordpress sites ranked in Google.  I&#039;ve done three test sites with some relatively easy keywords and debuted on page one with two of them with no backlinks, so I know this stuff works.

I was thinking maybe starting with the Ultra Spinnable Minis since I&#039;m not in the big leagues with you, yet.  Although, if you search for &quot;make $200 a day online&quot; in Google without the quotes, you&#039;re #2 and I&#039;m #3.  The thing is you&#039;re really doing it and I&#039;m just a wannabe.  :)

I like your style Pot Pie Girl.  Keep on posting your tips and tricks.  I&#039;m learning stuff.

Stacyman]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer,</p>
<p>This is a great article and it shows your great skill at writing articles which many of us don&#8217;t possess.</p>
<p>I remember somewhere you mentioned you don&#8217;t like hype.  That Killer Content guy is nothing but hype.  I really don&#8217;t care where he goes on vacation and what kind of luxury car he has.  He almost put me to sleep.  I had to hit the back button on that one.</p>
<p>The Ultra Spinnable Articles sounds promising.  Aren&#8217;t those the ones you used to build the 8 sites with?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had some success getting WordPress sites ranked in Google.  I&#8217;ve done three test sites with some relatively easy keywords and debuted on page one with two of them with no backlinks, so I know this stuff works.</p>
<p>I was thinking maybe starting with the Ultra Spinnable Minis since I&#8217;m not in the big leagues with you, yet.  Although, if you search for &#8220;make $200 a day online&#8221; in Google without the quotes, you&#8217;re #2 and I&#8217;m #3.  The thing is you&#8217;re really doing it and I&#8217;m just a wannabe.  🙂</p>
<p>I like your style Pot Pie Girl.  Keep on posting your tips and tricks.  I&#8217;m learning stuff.</p>
<p>Stacyman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eternity Diamond Wedding Bands		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eternity Diamond Wedding Bands]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s true that PLR articles are great but as mentioned above that everyone one has a chance to use them in their own way and making it unique to Google is the tricky part.  Google makes notice of repeated information and could over saturate the search engine with repetitious information.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s true that PLR articles are great but as mentioned above that everyone one has a chance to use them in their own way and making it unique to Google is the tricky part.  Google makes notice of repeated information and could over saturate the search engine with repetitious information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Katinka Hesselink		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11139</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katinka Hesselink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11139</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, just letting you know I featured you here on my list of the best squidoo blogs: http://www.marketingspiritual.com/2011/best-squidoo-blogs/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just letting you know I featured you here on my list of the best squidoo blogs: <a href="http://www.marketingspiritual.com/2011/best-squidoo-blogs/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.marketingspiritual.com/2011/best-squidoo-blogs/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cash Renegade		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11126</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cash Renegade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree on that equation, links plus good content will definitely make your keywords rank higher on search engines especially on Google it really like unique contents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on that equation, links plus good content will definitely make your keywords rank higher on search engines especially on Google it really like unique contents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rays		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rays]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[PLR content is still useful because it helps you to save time. You don&#039;t have to write an article from scratch. But the downside of PLR content is that everyone and their moms are using it.

If you want your PLR articles to rank, you will have to spend time editing to make them UNIQUE (I would say at least 80% unique). Just changing the title and few words will not get you far. Google is not stupid, they know what is PLR article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLR content is still useful because it helps you to save time. You don&#8217;t have to write an article from scratch. But the downside of PLR content is that everyone and their moms are using it.</p>
<p>If you want your PLR articles to rank, you will have to spend time editing to make them UNIQUE (I would say at least 80% unique). Just changing the title and few words will not get you far. Google is not stupid, they know what is PLR article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marketing Columbia SC		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marketing Columbia SC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jennifer,

A lot of great info here.

 Question for you...Do you use Market Samurai only to keep track of rankings or do you also use it for keyword research?

I recently got the free version and I was wondering just how useful it is.

Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer,</p>
<p>A lot of great info here.</p>
<p> Question for you&#8230;Do you use Market Samurai only to keep track of rankings or do you also use it for keyword research?</p>
<p>I recently got the free version and I was wondering just how useful it is.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Natalie		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11077</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Natalie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jennifer,

This is my first time posting, but I&#039;ve been following you for some time now.  Out of all the folks out there, I think the material you put out is the best!  Thanks for sharing your tips!

I purchased your OWM plan over a year ago, tried it out for several month, reading and re-reading, following steps, writing articles, (which I agree is extremely painful, especially when you know little about the topic or you run out of words to say for a topic you already know about), setting up niche sites, etc 

After much frustration time and  A LOT of money spent on this and that... I got No where!  

I really believe this plan will work, but I know I need to focus (part of my frustration of stopping was being pulled in MANY directions - I try to learn everything at one time - and the constant annoyance of being sold something that just was not working..

My question is, with all the changes in Google and with Squidoo that has occurred since your plan was written, are the steps in your OWM still valid? Do you have any ammendments, I really want to go at this again, but do it correctly this time... I need to prove to my husband, I&#039;m not crazy, that people are making money online and I&#039;m not wasting my time and money:).  

Where do I start, what can I do? I know I need to start from scratch.... just need a little guidance here...

Just so you know, I was a memember of Wealthy Affiliate, the keyword search was awesome, but that site was really overwhelming... just to much information that my brain was just not ready for...

Thanks again for all the info you provide!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer,</p>
<p>This is my first time posting, but I&#8217;ve been following you for some time now.  Out of all the folks out there, I think the material you put out is the best!  Thanks for sharing your tips!</p>
<p>I purchased your OWM plan over a year ago, tried it out for several month, reading and re-reading, following steps, writing articles, (which I agree is extremely painful, especially when you know little about the topic or you run out of words to say for a topic you already know about), setting up niche sites, etc </p>
<p>After much frustration time and  A LOT of money spent on this and that&#8230; I got No where!  </p>
<p>I really believe this plan will work, but I know I need to focus (part of my frustration of stopping was being pulled in MANY directions &#8211; I try to learn everything at one time &#8211; and the constant annoyance of being sold something that just was not working..</p>
<p>My question is, with all the changes in Google and with Squidoo that has occurred since your plan was written, are the steps in your OWM still valid? Do you have any ammendments, I really want to go at this again, but do it correctly this time&#8230; I need to prove to my husband, I&#8217;m not crazy, that people are making money online and I&#8217;m not wasting my time and money:).  </p>
<p>Where do I start, what can I do? I know I need to start from scratch&#8230;. just need a little guidance here&#8230;</p>
<p>Just so you know, I was a memember of Wealthy Affiliate, the keyword search was awesome, but that site was really overwhelming&#8230; just to much information that my brain was just not ready for&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks again for all the info you provide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zeph		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-11068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zeph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-11068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is an excellent and very useful post. And with all the &#039;less than useful&#039; PLR sources out there it&#039;s definitely great to have some links to reputable writers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent and very useful post. And with all the &#8216;less than useful&#8217; PLR sources out there it&#8217;s definitely great to have some links to reputable writers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PotPieGirl		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/content-content-content/#comment-10985</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PotPieGirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=1844#comment-10985</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hiya Shazi -

Thanks for your kind words and thank you for your first comment!  Glad to have you here at PotPieGirl.com!

You asked a really great question that I&#039;d like to address, but before I do I want to say something.

I&#039;ve been a member of WA for years...and I know Jay very well.  He is a VERY smart cookie.  I just want to mention that and be clear that anything I say next is not intended to discredit him or anything of that nature, ok?

OK, that said -

If it was completely true that only unique/high-quality content will rank now Post-Panda, why is that with my test sites, SIX of them rank for ONE keyword?  They currently rank #9, #11, #17, #21, #32, and #37 for that one keyword phrase.

This is a keyword that ONE of my sites is targeting, but I was sure to get it in the content on each of those sites that are all using a spun version of ONE article.

Also important to note - I did NOT build back links to 5 of these sites with this one phrase as the anchor text (one I did - it was the site that was created to target that specific phrase).

And to top it all off, other people are using spun versions of the same article, too.

Draw your own conclusions from what I said, but my very best advice is this - -

When in doubt, or when you&#039;re just curious - TEST IT YOURSELF.

Yes, unique/high-quality content will do very well IF it has back links, and viral/sharing links, etc etc.  But I have watched too many marketers - especially those that are new - spend a TON of time writing that &quot;one perfect article&quot; - and then finding out that they can&#039;t rank for their phrase...or the niche doesn&#039;t make them money.

Thank you for a GREAT question!

Jennifer
~PotPieGirl]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Shazi &#8211;</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words and thank you for your first comment!  Glad to have you here at PotPieGirl.com!</p>
<p>You asked a really great question that I&#8217;d like to address, but before I do I want to say something.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a member of WA for years&#8230;and I know Jay very well.  He is a VERY smart cookie.  I just want to mention that and be clear that anything I say next is not intended to discredit him or anything of that nature, ok?</p>
<p>OK, that said &#8211;</p>
<p>If it was completely true that only unique/high-quality content will rank now Post-Panda, why is that with my test sites, SIX of them rank for ONE keyword?  They currently rank #9, #11, #17, #21, #32, and #37 for that one keyword phrase.</p>
<p>This is a keyword that ONE of my sites is targeting, but I was sure to get it in the content on each of those sites that are all using a spun version of ONE article.</p>
<p>Also important to note &#8211; I did NOT build back links to 5 of these sites with this one phrase as the anchor text (one I did &#8211; it was the site that was created to target that specific phrase).</p>
<p>And to top it all off, other people are using spun versions of the same article, too.</p>
<p>Draw your own conclusions from what I said, but my very best advice is this &#8211; &#8211;</p>
<p>When in doubt, or when you&#8217;re just curious &#8211; TEST IT YOURSELF.</p>
<p>Yes, unique/high-quality content will do very well IF it has back links, and viral/sharing links, etc etc.  But I have watched too many marketers &#8211; especially those that are new &#8211; spend a TON of time writing that &#8220;one perfect article&#8221; &#8211; and then finding out that they can&#8217;t rank for their phrase&#8230;or the niche doesn&#8217;t make them money.</p>
<p>Thank you for a GREAT question!</p>
<p>Jennifer<br />
~PotPieGirl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
