<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Weirdness in the Google Search Results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 04:44:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.4</generator>
<atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://pubsubhubbub.superfeedr.com"/><atom:link rel="hub" href="https://websubhub.com/hub"/>	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Martin		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Google is really weird and now becoming more weird each day. I don&#039;t know how much the price tag is, but you know, I&#039;m not really fond of paid success. They are not just worth it for a long term investment.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is really weird and now becoming more weird each day. I don&#8217;t know how much the price tag is, but you know, I&#8217;m not really fond of paid success. They are not just worth it for a long term investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: shalisha		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shalisha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jennifer.  I love your new look.  I trust you because I&#039;ve travelled with you since the beginning.  I was wondering, does your ONE WEEK MARKETING still work?  What I mean is, most IM tactics get old and are no longer relevant.  OWM is 2 years old and some of the sites you direct us to in there are no longer there.  So do you have an update on it or do we continue to use the techniques you give us?   I really like your model, but I&#039;m not seeing sales yet and I&#039;m wondering if OWM is too old and the internet changes so fast with new methods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer.  I love your new look.  I trust you because I&#8217;ve travelled with you since the beginning.  I was wondering, does your ONE WEEK MARKETING still work?  What I mean is, most IM tactics get old and are no longer relevant.  OWM is 2 years old and some of the sites you direct us to in there are no longer there.  So do you have an update on it or do we continue to use the techniques you give us?   I really like your model, but I&#8217;m not seeing sales yet and I&#8217;m wondering if OWM is too old and the internet changes so fast with new methods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rahul		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14567</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rahul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14567</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Right now i see no sponsored ads for same keyword, y?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right now i see no sponsored ads for same keyword, y?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Local Online Marketing		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Local Online Marketing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think local search is where Google is headed... more and more searches have maps. Keywords that didn&#039;t bring up a map last month now does.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think local search is where Google is headed&#8230; more and more searches have maps. Keywords that didn&#8217;t bring up a map last month now does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Internet Milijunas		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14547</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Milijunas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14547</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing a great article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing a great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ron's Copywriting Blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron's Copywriting Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13999&quot;&gt;PotPieGirl&lt;/a&gt;.

Even in India, the PPC results can be found at the bottom of the SERP. So, perhaps it is seeping through to everywhere, who knows?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13999">PotPieGirl</a>.</p>
<p>Even in India, the PPC results can be found at the bottom of the SERP. So, perhaps it is seeping through to everywhere, who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hendrik		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hendrik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13911&quot;&gt;hyderali&lt;/a&gt;.

Yap, indeed and not only with the amount of displayed entries but also by CTR-strong verticals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13911">hyderali</a>.</p>
<p>Yap, indeed and not only with the amount of displayed entries but also by CTR-strong verticals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Advancement		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Advancement]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi everybody! PotPieGirl, thanks for sharing. This development  is sad yet logical. It should have happened sooner or later. 
Soooo, webmasters, it&#039;s time to focus on managing PCC campaigns:((]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody! PotPieGirl, thanks for sharing. This development  is sad yet logical. It should have happened sooner or later.<br />
Soooo, webmasters, it&#8217;s time to focus on managing PCC campaigns:((</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Googler		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Googler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;and I know that many consumers don’t click Adwords and instead only click organic search results. I’m an organic search results person as well when I have my consumer hat on.&quot;

We realize that and that is precisely why we&#039;re working hard on main ads seamlessly blend with the organic results. Most of the time though, ads are far below ads as we follow ads with images, local, news and especially products. Considering that we can check the quality sites of our advertisers we feel more confident about your satisfaction when you click on ads.

Merry Christmas to the SEO community and expect new major changes in January and especially for Panda&#039;s anniversary.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;and I know that many consumers don’t click Adwords and instead only click organic search results. I’m an organic search results person as well when I have my consumer hat on.&#8221;</p>
<p>We realize that and that is precisely why we&#8217;re working hard on main ads seamlessly blend with the organic results. Most of the time though, ads are far below ads as we follow ads with images, local, news and especially products. Considering that we can check the quality sites of our advertisers we feel more confident about your satisfaction when you click on ads.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas to the SEO community and expect new major changes in January and especially for Panda&#8217;s anniversary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Genevieve		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14389</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Genevieve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi PotPieGirl!
How are you doing these days? I feel as though I haven&#039;t gotten an update in quite a long time.
I&#039;m curious about your rank-checking tool; do you collect data about my searches, urls, and keywords?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi PotPieGirl!<br />
How are you doing these days? I feel as though I haven&#8217;t gotten an update in quite a long time.<br />
I&#8217;m curious about your rank-checking tool; do you collect data about my searches, urls, and keywords?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Lawlor		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14335</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Lawlor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14335</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
Good observation Jen.  I&#039;d be very surprised if Google ever did away with their organic search results.  I run websites for many local businesses (used to own a local business myself) and I know that many consumers don&#039;t click Adwords and instead only click organic search results.  I&#039;m an organic search results person as well when I have my consumer hat on.

Organic and PPC dovetail perfectly with eachother.  I understand Google may test different variations in number of listings.  That&#039;s probably a good idea on their part.  I suspect at the end of the day there will be a balance or close balance between Adwords and organic listings.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Good observation Jen.  I&#8217;d be very surprised if Google ever did away with their organic search results.  I run websites for many local businesses (used to own a local business myself) and I know that many consumers don&#8217;t click Adwords and instead only click organic search results.  I&#8217;m an organic search results person as well when I have my consumer hat on.</p>
<p>Organic and PPC dovetail perfectly with eachother.  I understand Google may test different variations in number of listings.  That&#8217;s probably a good idea on their part.  I suspect at the end of the day there will be a balance or close balance between Adwords and organic listings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Hempsell		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hempsell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I doubt Google will go all paid as the users will cotton on and realize the results are stacked.
But i think they might reduce the number of organic results which is bad for anyone near the bottom of page 1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Google will go all paid as the users will cotton on and realize the results are stacked.<br />
But i think they might reduce the number of organic results which is bad for anyone near the bottom of page 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James &#124; Photo Scanner		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14254</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James &#124; Photo Scanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14254</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13934&quot;&gt;Mister_Papagiorgio&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s all conjecture I agree. But, all SEO were based on these conjectures. Some worked, others didn&#039;t. It&#039;s just a matter of picking the ones that proved correct. As to this post&#039;s subject, my &#039;conjecture&#039; is Google indeed is heading that way. Paid ads will dominate and soon all organic search results will be relegated to the 2nd or 3rd pages. That way, Google gets more advertisers and thus, more revenue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13934">Mister_Papagiorgio</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all conjecture I agree. But, all SEO were based on these conjectures. Some worked, others didn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s just a matter of picking the ones that proved correct. As to this post&#8217;s subject, my &#8216;conjecture&#8217; is Google indeed is heading that way. Paid ads will dominate and soon all organic search results will be relegated to the 2nd or 3rd pages. That way, Google gets more advertisers and thus, more revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Grinder		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grinder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My business is based solely on organic results, so this does have me very worried.  However, I am at least thankful Yahoo and Bing are treating me well.  I hope google doesn&#039;t ultimately forget what made them special.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My business is based solely on organic results, so this does have me very worried.  However, I am at least thankful Yahoo and Bing are treating me well.  I hope google doesn&#8217;t ultimately forget what made them special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14214</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14214</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would argue that Google&#039;s ability to deliver a highly-relevant search experience to the average surfer will be severely compromised by an over-abundance of ads, or by giving precedence to sites that earn Google money (but only if those sites aren&#039;t particularly relevant to the search query).  

Not providing the most relevant results would threaten the core of their business - which isn&#039;t advertisers, but the surfers who visit to search. Without them, there is no business. While the big &quot;G&quot; has held the top spot for some time now, it&#039;s not like visitors don&#039;t have a credible search alternative in Bing. I&#039;m sure Google knows that if they alienate their viewers, they can watch their business spiral down the drain. 

So I expect the move to more paid listings to proceed cautiously indeed - same with the precedence given to sites affiliated with Google. As long as those sites really do fill the needs of a searcher performing a keyword search, it&#039;s unlikely to cause any problems for the big G.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that Google&#8217;s ability to deliver a highly-relevant search experience to the average surfer will be severely compromised by an over-abundance of ads, or by giving precedence to sites that earn Google money (but only if those sites aren&#8217;t particularly relevant to the search query).  </p>
<p>Not providing the most relevant results would threaten the core of their business &#8211; which isn&#8217;t advertisers, but the surfers who visit to search. Without them, there is no business. While the big &#8220;G&#8221; has held the top spot for some time now, it&#8217;s not like visitors don&#8217;t have a credible search alternative in Bing. I&#8217;m sure Google knows that if they alienate their viewers, they can watch their business spiral down the drain. </p>
<p>So I expect the move to more paid listings to proceed cautiously indeed &#8211; same with the precedence given to sites affiliated with Google. As long as those sites really do fill the needs of a searcher performing a keyword search, it&#8217;s unlikely to cause any problems for the big G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Keith		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14096</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Keith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13995&quot;&gt;Rach72&lt;/a&gt;.

1 result was the images, you could say related searches was another. Really there are 9 results here instead of 8, not that far off IMO. Still I agree with everyone about the PPC comments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13995">Rach72</a>.</p>
<p>1 result was the images, you could say related searches was another. Really there are 9 results here instead of 8, not that far off IMO. Still I agree with everyone about the PPC comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Parvesh Sareen		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parvesh Sareen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Google will soon be paid overall and we should be paying for the search too ;).. As most of internet business , google has acquired and this day will not be too far  that every service of google will be limited to millionaires or billionaires who can pay them willfully.
Well that was a joke , but never know it can be reality someday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will soon be paid overall and we should be paying for the search too ;).. As most of internet business , google has acquired and this day will not be too far  that every service of google will be limited to millionaires or billionaires who can pay them willfully.<br />
Well that was a joke , but never know it can be reality someday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenni		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13938&quot;&gt;Bernard&lt;/a&gt;.

You need to read the book &quot;The Google Story&quot;. It explains how Google&#039;s advertising model was developed purposely to be completely different from Yahoo, AOL etc. And let&#039;s face it, their model has stood the test of time and Yahoo and AOL only continue to decline. Google isn&#039;t stupid. They know too many/too obvious ads will drive people away. And Google&#039;s ads are useful, quality, relevant ads. Searchers&#039; quality remains the same, it&#039;s the sites that don&#039;t have the budget for PPC that are screwed by this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-13938">Bernard</a>.</p>
<p>You need to read the book &#8220;The Google Story&#8221;. It explains how Google&#8217;s advertising model was developed purposely to be completely different from Yahoo, AOL etc. And let&#8217;s face it, their model has stood the test of time and Yahoo and AOL only continue to decline. Google isn&#8217;t stupid. They know too many/too obvious ads will drive people away. And Google&#8217;s ads are useful, quality, relevant ads. Searchers&#8217; quality remains the same, it&#8217;s the sites that don&#8217;t have the budget for PPC that are screwed by this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DWaters		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DWaters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Jennifer, Thanks for the Tools page. I was actually about to go looking for a good way to check my site&#039;s key word ranking when I got an email from you to check your recent post. However I have been using they Ranking Checker the last few days and I did find an inconsistency. The tool only shows my site on page 8 for a certain keyword (and it is my Privacy Policy page at that). When i check I am on page one but more importantly I had a third party check those keywords and he also found that URL on page one. I refreshed, incase it was a cached page, and got the same result. I am not sure what any of this means. I am sure I will continue to use the tool and I do appreciate it. Thanks - DW]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer, Thanks for the Tools page. I was actually about to go looking for a good way to check my site&#8217;s key word ranking when I got an email from you to check your recent post. However I have been using they Ranking Checker the last few days and I did find an inconsistency. The tool only shows my site on page 8 for a certain keyword (and it is my Privacy Policy page at that). When i check I am on page one but more importantly I had a third party check those keywords and he also found that URL on page one. I refreshed, incase it was a cached page, and got the same result. I am not sure what any of this means. I am sure I will continue to use the tool and I do appreciate it. Thanks &#8211; DW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. Marc		</title>
		<link>https://www.potpiegirl.com/weirdness-in-the-google-search-results/#comment-14055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate></pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.potpiegirl.com/?p=2492#comment-14055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[At the end of the day it&#039;s a business.

If Google keeps going over board with lousy search results thus purposely pointing searchers to ads then folks will catch on to that fairly quick and STOP using it becasue they know the results are not real like the USED to be. 

Facebook favors Bing (don&#039;t have to say what a powerhouse FB is - once they go public, Google shareholders will sell to buy FB stock, mmmmmaybe?) and if Google keeps on over-doing it like this they will end up on an episode of &quot;American Greed&quot; with Stacy Keach!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the end of the day it&#8217;s a business.</p>
<p>If Google keeps going over board with lousy search results thus purposely pointing searchers to ads then folks will catch on to that fairly quick and STOP using it becasue they know the results are not real like the USED to be. </p>
<p>Facebook favors Bing (don&#8217;t have to say what a powerhouse FB is &#8211; once they go public, Google shareholders will sell to buy FB stock, mmmmmaybe?) and if Google keeps on over-doing it like this they will end up on an episode of &#8220;American Greed&#8221; with Stacy Keach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
