11 Comments

  1. PotPieGirl says:

    I also want to add a big “Thank You” to the Squidoo staff regarding how the title tag is handled now on Squidoo lenses.

    Previously, all lens titles were –

    your lens title you chose On Squidoo

    Now, the ‘On Squidoo’ part is gone =) Unless it is an OctoSquid Clone…..

    Folks, make good use of the title you choose for your lens… it is powerful.

    Squidoo staff – THANK YOU for making that change!

  2. Hmmm, interesting. I always thought the dip in traffic was from the change in lens formats at about that same time. All of my lenses lost major traffic. I experimented with one of my high traffic lense, when I unmaxed it (back to the old format) the traffic went back up after a couple days. I only did one, I wanted to wait and see what happened before I changed 200 lenses:)

    I re-maxed that lens in late May, and it’s still trucking along.
    I totally agree with you, the Squid staff rocks, I knew they’d work it out whatever the problem was:)

    Linettes last blog post..We’re Getting A New Squidoo Dashboard

  3. PotPieGirl says:

    Hi Linette!

    Yup.. I heard many thoughts that the drop in traffic was due to the new layout, or the ‘explore related pages’ option on our intro modules, or both =)

    I really think the OctoSquid got us for a while – but like I said, this is my theory. I saw these OctoSquid Clones ranking where the authentic lens SHOULD have been listed. I still see them pop up every now and then, but for the most part, these clones seemed to be filtered – or re-crawled and out of the index.

    Thankfully, this all seems to be in the past, but I would still love to know just how much organic traffic Squidoo lost due to the attack of the OctoSquid.

    Thanks for reading!!!!

    Jennifer

  4. Jennifer,

    Ran through a few pages of the octosquid lenses and found at least one from somene you probably know.

    http://www.squidoo.com/Shel_Silverstein – belongs to kab

    Found one of mine on there, but it’s not like it had a lot of traffic before so I’m not sure I’d be that helpful. But it went from having an occasional visitor to next-to-nobody.

    Doesn’t Squidoo automatically ping Google when you update a lens? So theoretically, those of us who update regularly should be getting reindexed. Course, my last update to my octosquid lens was just a week ago, so maybe not. (Oh, it would be so nice if this was try and all the trash lenses that get created and left would never be found. πŸ™‚

    SusanVillasLewiss last blog post..Women worth a second look for being first

  5. PotPieGirl says:

    Hi Susan =)

    Yes, I believe that Squidoo DOES ‘ping’ automatically when we update/publish a lens. If you even try to manually ping a newly published lens from another service, you usually will get an error message or a “You’re pinging us too fast” message.

    Here’s the thing – the authentic lens and the OctoSquid Clones are seen as two individual web pages. Pinging the authentic lens won’t do anything to the clone lens.

    Should we ‘ping’ a clone lens if we have one? This I am not sure about. The theory sounds good – ping it, the SEs go and re-crawl it, they see its a blocked page and then pop it out if the index.

    If I found a clone lens of mine, *I* would be tempted to try pinging the OctoSquid, but I won’t do anything like that to a lens that is NOT mine. Another option is to talk about, and link to, a clone lens on a blog. In theory, that should lead Google there and get it re-crawled. There are potential down sides to that theory, too.

    I would most likely just do things to protect my authentic lens. I would build some more back links to my real lens to help establish ‘ownership’ of the content in the SEs ‘eyes’. In time, the Clone lens will drop out of the index.

    Bottom line is – re-crawling and re-indexing a site of this size takes time… lots and lots of time. Google is slowly getting there. That 800+ clone lenses may look like a lot to y’all right now, but I promise you that at one time, it was a MUCH higher number.

    While working on one of my clients sites, I have been (not-so) patiently waiting for Google to reindex NINE pages of this static site. NINE, thats all! It has taken two months. And guess what? That is considered FAST for some webmasters.

    Susan, thanks for reading!!!

    Jennifer

  6. It was spring time, people just started playing golf again and spending time out side, you always take a hit in the spring and the summer.

    Fall it comes back with the getting ready for Christmas season, all the way thru to spring again. March is the best month for brick and mortar businesses as spring gets people out from under snow.

    You should live in AZ, most golf courses in the US, play all year. The Courses suck though compared to the back east clubs I grew up on. No big trees and flat.

  7. PotPieGirl says:

    @Chris – I gotta tell ya, there are a LOT of days that I would be quite happy with no trees on the course! 90% air… ha! Yeah, right!

    @ Captain Squid – I think it is helping traffic via page views, too. I also wonder if more folks are using PPC to get traffic to their lenses…. thoughts?

  8. The Octosquid is now showing 21,000 pages! Has this come back to haunt us?

  9. PotPieGirl says:

    Hiya Clefty –

    I’ve been watching that, too. While there seems to be a return of the octosquid, I don’t think it is causing the issues it was before.

    I have lenses that have a current clone, and

    1 – I don’t see any change in the traffic patterns of those lenses, and

    2 – I don’t notice these clones ranking where the authentic lens should rank.

    Also, I don’t see these octosquid clones being password protected anymore. However, clicking on one of them takes you to the Squidoo.com home page.

    I’m keeping an eye on it =)

    Thanks for reading!!

    Jennifer

Comments are closed.